Skip to content

Exploring Sigmund Freud’s Psychoanalysis Approach

Published: at 12:00 AM

Sigmund Freud is the founder of psychoanalysis, and during his highly productive and distinguished career developed a pioneering theory of the nature and workings of the human mind, and applied it to psychology and Western culture in general. It made an immeasurable impact.

Freud used the analogy of an iceberg to describe the three levels of the mind.

Perhaps the most impactful idea put forth by Freud was his model of the human mind. In this model, there are three metaphorical parts to the mind:

  1. Id: it’s the unconscious level that contains sexual and aggressive drives and hidden memories.
  2. Ego: It is the most tied to reality and begins to develop in infancy. It is the part that mediates between the desires of the id and the superego in a socially appropriate way.
  3. Superego: portion of the mind in which morality and higher principles reside, encouraging us to act in socially and morally acceptable ways (McLeod, 2013).

In 1900, Freud published The Interpretation of Dreams, stating that the main purpose of dreams is to achieve individual wish fulfillment by enabling individuals to deal with some of their repressed problems against reality (Sigmund Freud Biography, n.d.).

He also distinguished between the manifest content (the actual dream) and the latent content (the true or hidden meaning behind the dream).

It was also in The Interpretation of Dreams that Freud introduced perhaps his most famous concept of the Oedipus complex. It describes a child’s desire for their opposite-sex parent and feelings of envy, jealousy, resentment, and competition with the same-sex parent. It’s important to note that there’s very little evidence that the Oedipus complex is real.

From the hypnotic experiments, and in collaboration with his colleague Josef Breuer, Freud developed a novel approach in which patients talked about what came to their minds — memories, dreams, thoughts, emotions, etc. And then sequentially analyzed this information to determine the symptoms of the patient. The process is called “Free association”.

Anna O. suffered from hysteria. Hysteria is a condition in which the patient exhibits physical symptoms like paralysis, convulsions, hallucinations, loss of speech, etc, with no apparent physical cause. Her doctor (and Freud’s mentor), successfully treated Anna by helping her recall forgotten memories of her traumatic event.

In conversations with her, it was revealed that she developed a fear of drinking when a dog she hated drank from her glass. It happened while I was taking care of my father.

She did not express her fear of his illness, but later during psychoanalysis. As soon as she had a chance to become aware of these unconscious thoughts, her numbness disappeared.

Sigmund Freud (1894, 1896) noted many ego-defense mechanisms that he mentioned in his writings. His daughter Anna Freud (1936) developed and fleshed out these ideas, adding ten of her own. Many psychoanalysts add other types of ego defenses as well.

Anna Freud defined defense mechanisms as “unconscious resources used by the ego” to decrease internal stress ultimately. Patients often devise these unconscious mechanisms to decrease conflict within themselves, specifically between the superego and id.

Critical evaluation

Freudian theory is good at explaining behavior, but bad at predicting it (which is one of the goals of science). For this reason, Freud’s theory is not falsifiable and cannot be proven or disproved. For example, the unconscious is difficult to objectively test and measure.

Freud may also have exhibited research bias in his interpretation. He may have focused only on information that supported his theories, ignoring information and other explanations that did not fit them.

Even if Freud’s recollection of the events discussed in therapy was perfectly accurate, the descriptions given to him by the patient may not have been consistent with reality. It is well known that he took little time to review his experiences, especially the testimony that accused his family of sexual abuse.

Critics argue that he should have interviewed his family to determine the accuracy of the patient’s account.


Check article on Medium👆